Leadership: February 4, 2003

Archives

In December, 2001, the U.S. Army asked a panel of senior officers to examine the usefulness of training male and female recruits in the same basic training companies. Only recruits headed for combat units (infantry, armor, artillery, Etc.) are trained in all male companies. Mixing men and women in basic training has long been seen as an inefficient sop to feminist politicians. When the panel finished their study, they agreed that the policy was inefficient, but recommended that it be kept anyway. Left unsaid was the acknowledgement that no one really wanted to get involved in a spat with Congress over this. The military has long since learned that as long as some stupid policy doesn't get a lot of people killed in an obvious way, just keep your mouth shut and do what the politicians want.

X

ad

Help Keep StrategyPage Open

First came Facebook, then came Twitter, and finally, AI has arrived. They have all caused a decline in our business, but AI may be the deadliest innovation. We are currently in survival mode. Our writers and staff receive no payment in some months, and even when they do, it is below the minimum wage for their efforts. You can support us with your donations or subscriptions. Please help us keep our doors open.

Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on X.

Subscribe   Donate   Close